AuthorMariah ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Mac Vs Pc For Photoshop Performance10/20/2021
It was also the most powerful computer we've ever tested on Production Expert to date. This is because Apple ensures that.In February 2020, we tested Apple's new Mac Pro 7.1 courtesy of our friends at Jigsaw24. The results of this test proved that the Mac Pro 7.1 is indeed a competent machine for demanding recording studio applications. Depending on your primary use case for using Photoshop and the types of documents you generally work with, different combinations of these settings may suit you.While the life expectancy of a Macbook versus a PC cannot be determined perfectly, MacBooks tend to last longer than PCs. Have we found a budget-friendly Mac Pro alternative in the Windows 10 machine? Read on to find out…Photoshop provides a set of preferences (Preferences > Performance) to help you make optimum use of your computer's resources, such as memory, cache, graphics processor, displays, etc. We set out to discover how it compares to Apple’s new Mac Pro 7.1 and share our findings on how the user experience is of this machine when pushed to the max.I briefly considered buying one but the price of the entry-level system and specification didn't appeal. I reverted to type when Apple announced the new Mac Pro 7.1. For over a decade I've owned several Mac Pro 5.1 systems which have proved time and again to be not only reliable in daily studio use but excellent value for money as well.
![]() Vs Pc For Photoshop Performance Mac Pro 7![]() In terms of sheer power, the Windows machine proves to be well equipped to handle extremely large sessions, but how was the general user experience?I thought the machine would start to ramp up the speed of the case fans while the number of tracks and plug-in instances increased. We also managed to add 45 extra instances of Boom on top of what the Mac Pro 7.1 could achieve natively. We managed to double the number of native instances of Eleven, which is a remarkable feat as this particular plug-in is regarded as quite power-hungry. We were able to outperform the Mac Pro 7.1 we tested earlier in 2020 by a sizeable margin. The different results for the mac mini are from two tests which show different results depending on the combination of tracks and plug-ins.Windows PC Pro Tools Power Test Results NotesThe results of this Windows PC power test were quite surprising. Where can u download serum vstiWhile this machine proved it could host and playback this huge track count the user experience was severely compromised. The meters didn’t display smoothly and the cursor lagged which wouldn’t be suitable in a real world session of this size. So far, so good, what’s the catch? Graphical and operational performance both started to suffer in Pro Tools as the test grew to its limits. ![]()
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |